The ECtHR has made it mandatory for individual applications originating from the profession made from Turkey after 1 January 2026.#atfp_close_translate_span# “Cover Sheet” Its practice is a structural arrangement that clearly reveals which methodology, within which limits and with what priorities the Court will examine these files, rather than a merely a technical innovation regarding the procedural. Although it is especially emphasized that the cover page is not a substitute for the official application form, the application enforcementIn the first stage of the ECtHR, the files of the ECtHR can be found on this cover It clearly shows that it will subject it to a preliminary examination and that it will filter the complaints within this framework.
on the cover “The complaints made” It is noteworthy that the section consists of predefined, limited and standardized complaint headings, unlike the classical application form. This structure reveals that the ECtHR will no longer deal with the ECtHR’s applications for dismissal from the profession after 15 July, not through event-based long narratives, but through typical patterns of complaints. The Court openly acknowledges the fact of the mass appeal, “What evidence was used, how the trial was conducted, and what procedural guarantees were not used” It aims to evaluate the questions quickly, comparatively and comparatively through these standard headings to be marked by the applicants. This is more than detailed individual case narratives. shIt contains a strong guidance that the legal nature of the complaint will be decisive.
The most critical aspect of the cover application is “Only complaints against both the Constitutional Court and the ECtHR may be marked” is the clear limitation. This regulation, the ECtHR Subsidiarity principle clearly demonstrates that it will apply in a very strict manner.IR. Accordingly, a clear, concrete and materially unclaimed claim before the Constitutional Court will no longer be compensated for at the ECtHR. On the contrary, this situation is “by the Government of the Republic of Turkey”Complaints not raised in domestic law It is highly likely to be put forward systematically as a preliminary objection and defense argument on the grounds. In this respect, the cover application has a normative effect that determines the content of not only the applications before the ECtHR, but also the content of individual applications to the Constitutional Court retrospectively.
In this context, the titles of the complaints listed on the cover —For example, after the criminal conviction, the administrative judiciary should go to automatic approval without making an independent evaluation in terms of evidence, restriction of access to evidence and objection opportunities, not holding a hearing, relying on ambiguous concepts such as “contact/relatives”, unjustified decisions or interference with the right to respect for private life; It has now become necessary to put forward in a clear, systematic and materialized form before the Constitutional Court. Otherwise, the fact that these complaints cannot be marked on the cover in the ECtHR application will create a strong defense ground for the Turkish government and will lead to the risk of unacceptance of the application at the very first stage.
As a result, although the cover application does not explicitly name it, the ECtHR’s applications for dismissal from the profession originating from Turkey “Standards to an accelerated and accelerated review regime through types of violations” shows. For this reason, the applications to be made to both the Constitutional Court and the ECtHR are prepared on a pre-constructed, parallel, consistent and complete set of violations based on the complaint headings stipulated in the cover. It is no longer a choice but a compulsory procedural strategy.. The opposite approach will bring the risk of elimination of the application without any discussion on the merits of the violation..
